La Vallée: Barbet Schroeder’s 1972 very french (but not very good) film

original movie poster for la vallée also knows as “obscured by clouds”

the expression “obscured by clouds” refers to those areas that have never been cartographically surveyed since they are always blanketed in cloud

pink floyd created the music fo rth film and named their album “obscured by clouds” after a clip in the film with a map stating the words

viviane (ogier), the wife of the french consul in melbourne, joins a group of explorers in search of a mysterious hidden valley in the bush of new guinea, where she hopes to find the feathers of an extremely rare exotic bird. along the way through the dense jungles of papua new guinea and on the peak of mount giluwe…

she and the small group of explorers make contact with a native tribe called the “mapuga”, portrayed as one of the most isolated groups of human beings on earth, who inspire them to explore their own humanity, unfettered by their own subjective ideas of “civilization”. the search becomes a search for a paradise said to exist within a valley marked as “obscured by cloud” on the only map of the area available dated as surveyed in 1969.

came across this film aftrer watching a documentary called “chit chat with oysters” as floyd had done the music for this film. doesn’t look great, and rather sentimental and french, and i mean that not in a good way as we love the great french films. maybe worth a watch just for the imagery, good luck finding it, but in the mean time heres a review by anet maslin in the new york timesin may of 1981

“the beginning of barbet schroeder’s ”the valley obscured by llouds” finds viviane (bulle ogier) wearing a trim little dress and high heels, traipsing elegantly through the jungle as only a chic frenchwoman can. the bored wife of a diplomat stationed in melbourne, she is in new guinea to buy feathers, which she sells to a paris boutique.

in the trading post where she is first seen, she encounters the blond, bare-chested olivier (michael gothard), who claims to know where some fine feathers can be found. he seems to be making a few other claims too, but it is only the feathers that he mentions. anyhow, viviane soon embarks, with olivier and several very solemn, self-important hippies who are his friends, on a journey into the wilderness. they are in search, respectively, of feathers and truth …

viviane’s feathery-headedness may be something mr. schroeder intended. after she witnesses the spectacular mapuga festivities that mark the film’s climax, she cries ”olivier, isn’t it wonderful? we’ve become so close to them we’re practically one of them – we’ve found truth, you know!”

olivier quickly shoots a hole in this theory, but only a few minutes later the film is over, with viviane supposedly on the brink of enlightenment. has she really found wisdom through the mapugas? or is she merely fascinated by their makeup and jewelry ideas? schroeder is … neither an observer of nor a participant in his material, and the middle ground he inhabits remains ill defined. his film is by no means uninteresting, but it lacks the clear vision that might have turned it into a genuine act of exploration.” by ar

werner herzogs aguirre, the wrath of god: disturbing facts

yes again! – just watched it and learned these facts… some funny but some pretty horrific and sad actually

“aguirre, the wrath of god” was werner herzog’s first film with klaus kinski.

herzog and kinski had met many years earlier, when the struggling young actor rented a room in herzog’s family’s apartment.

kinski’s antics during the three months he lived there left a lasting impression. years later, herzog knew the volatile actor was the only possible man who could play the mad aguirre, and sent kinski a copy of the screenplay. “between three and four in the morning, the phone rang,” herzog recalled. “It took me at least a couple of minutes before I realized that it was kinski who was the source of this inarticulate screaming.”

francis ford coppola cited this film as an influence onapocalypse now (1979).

the idea for the film began when werner herzog borrowed a book on historical adventurers from a friend. the plot was inspired by a half-page about lope de aguirre.

the real lope de aguirre

klaus kinski’s crazed performance bore similarities to the real lope de aguirre, a “true homicidal megalomaniac”. many of his fellow soldiers considered his actions to be that of a madman. kinski’s use of a limp reflected one that aguirre actually had, the result of a battle injury.

Werner Herzog claims to have written the screenplay in two and a half days.

herzog himself never was a film student there or anywhere.

gerhard martienzen – voiceover for klaus kinski

the film was originally shot in english. the whole film was later dubbed into german. werner herzog claims that kinski wanted too much money for the recording sessions, so gerd martienzen dubbed him – audiences that have seen Kinski’s other performances often can’t tell the difference.

actress’ helena rojo (l) and cecilia rivera playing flores, aguirre’s daughter (r)

in his autobiography ‘all i need is love’ klaus kinski wrote: “…my daughter in the film, a sixteen-year-old blond peruvian, was fucked by almost everyone, I think.”  sigh!

the complete crew consisted of just eight people.

sixteen-year-old flores (cecilia rivera) who had almost no dialogue in the entire movie

klaus kinski, irritated by the noise from a hut repeatedly fired with a winchester rifle into it. one of the bullets took the tip of an unnamed extra’s finger off. werner herzog immediately confiscated the weapon… and it remains his property to this day.

in one opening scene, when the carriage holding ursúa’s mistress tips over and threatens to collapse, a hand comes in from the right side of the frame to assist the actors in steadying their hold. that hand belongs to director werner herzog.

aguirre’s line “what is a throne but a plank red with velvet?” is an authentic quote from napoleon bonaparte.

near the end of the shooting, werner herzog thought he’d lost all the negatives. several weeks later, he discovered that the shipping agency at the Lima airport had completed all paperwork needed to ship the film cans – but hadn’t actually shipped them.

this film, as well as several other early films by werner herzog, were shot on a 35mm camera that he stole as a young man from the munich film school, a predecessor to today’s prestigious film school ‘HFF münchen’.

he readily admits to the theft but also justifies it with the significance of the films he’s made with the camera and his right to artistic expression: “It was a very simple 35mm camera, one I used on many other films, so I do not consider it a theft. For me, it was truly a necessity. I wanted to make films and needed a camera. I had some sort of natural right to this tool. If you need air to breathe, and you are locked in a room, you have to take a chisel and hammer and break down a wall. It is your absolute right.”

soundtrack music by florian fricke – herzogs soccer buddy

florian fricke, who composed the film’s music, was one of werner herzog’s former soccer teammates. werner herzog explained how the choir-like sound was created. “we used a strange instrument, which we called a ‘choir-organ.’ It has inside it three dozen different tapes running parallel to each other in loops. … all these tapes are running at the same time, and there is a keyboard on which you can play them like an organ so that [it will] sound just like a human choir but yet, at the same time, very artificial and really quite eerie.”

moog modular III synthesizer

the instrument was most likely a mellotron M400, introduced in 1970. It had 35 keys and was a staple of early-1970s progressive rock. (no it wasn’t! it was a moog modular III synthesizer)

boat on a tree

mexican craftsmen built the boat with attached canoe floating on top of a tall tree for the hallucination scenes at the end of the movie.

john okello the butcher of zanzibar

the character of aguirre, especially his speech at the end, ‘anyone who drinks one extra drop of water will be sentenced to 150 years in jail” was based in part on the zanzibar revolutionary john okello. by dd

here’s a film on godard written by anna about love: funny how godard only made love stories that had nothing to do with love?

louis garrel and stacy martin as jean-luc godard and anne wiazemsky

and the real GOD (ard)!

redoubtable a film about jean-luc godard by michel hazanavicius

sorry folks, but a movie on jean-luc godard to us, is like a movie about mohammad to the isis crew – we have no choice but to issue a full fatwah against the director. i’m sure we’ll have to go see it, just to rag on it. i anticipate this will be like the serge gainsbourg film “a heroic life”, which won the prestigious gold award for worse title ever… disappointing and somewhat of a shame. by ars + dd

a little film on serge gainsbourg

serge gainsbourg on dog abuse. this is near the end of the time when he was somewhat manageable. poor serge… in his drunken years he embarrassed himself many times, not to mention with whitney houston of all people; but, we do miss him nonetheless. i finally saw the film, gainsbourg: a heroic life, which was awful and rather shameless. the only bits of interest surfaced around the resemblance of eric elmosnino to serge, and laetitia casta’s surprisingly decent acting in the bardot dance. true serge fans would have thrown their repettos at the director joann sfar. how could you screw up such a life? by dd

frozen kenny: south park

as some of you may know i live in a log cabin in the secluded woods of northern vermont and have not had a cable connection since i was 2. i just wanted to share my latest discovery of this show that has been playing on the television for some time apparently, and its called south park… for no specific reason. you may know about it. i was watching wes anderson’s fantastic mister fox one day and was laughing about jarvis cocker’s hillbilly tune in the film and my friend said “well that’s right out of south park”.

south park? i was intrigued, and so i watched a bunch of episodes the other day and “starvin marvin” and “the cartman robot” were quite noteworthy and profound. that said, the rest was a good pile of crap. not funny and not even gross enough (that’s if you’ve ever watched passolini’s salo) it was not really anything, just a good waste of 20 minutes. but from one complainer to another i like the fact that they basically rag on everything. they should start making plastic figures and t-shirts. they would do quite well. by dd

the review of the film: shoe by Andre Saraiva

the film shoe by swedish-born, french adopted, graffiti artist monsieur a, turned club owner and man-about-town is finally here. the first installment, or perhaps trailer, with a very long title sequence launched this weekend on nowness. nowness, for the record, is owned by LVMH and was previously known as e-luxury, which was shut down and re-grounded into its current format, an editorial site to squeeze goods in, between goods. the part one clip (posted here) does have a nice title sequence by andre reminiscent of saul bass and other 60’s giants. it was also nicely colorized and filmed in paris, where we follow the “metatarsus varus” french actor walkabout town and kiss a girl. the plot really steams up when he hands out two cigarettes to two seated girls. when asked, olivier zahn, the co-writer of this so far silent film, said “the film is about a character very close to any young french guy who likes to flirt with girls in paris.” very interesting and unusual indeed! the depth here reminds me of the early days of purple. when it was in a book format and co-published by elein fleiss. now of course we don’t want to speak prematurely without seeing the entire film, but if the intention here was to intrigue, we are still awaiting the intrigue. by dd